Topic: const-qualification on weak_ptr::owner_before
Author: Ai Azuma<ai.azuma@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Raw View
Is there any reason why weak_ptr::owner_before member function
templates are not const-qualified?
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Raw View
Am 06.09.2011 20:19, schrieb Ai Azuma:
>
> Is there any reason why weak_ptr::owner_before member function
> templates are not const-qualified?
I'm pretty sure there isn't. It is amusing to note that this miss has
been undetected from the accepted paper on:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2637.pdf
This is a near-to editorial issue, forwarded to LWG.
Greetings from Bremen,
Daniel Kr gler
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try posting with your ]
[ newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-cpp-submit@vandevoorde.com ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]