Topic: State of N2979
Author: Fuz <softnfuzzyrobb@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:33:03 CST Raw View
I'm referring to the following proposal:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2979.html
I've noticed that the proposed lightweight <move> header has not made
it into the FCD. Does that mean we'll have to continue to include
<utility> (or worse, <algorithm>) in order to swap objects? Is there
still a chance of this proposal making it into C++0x?
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Author: =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=3DFCgler?=3D <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.c=.om>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:29:18 CST Raw View
On Apr 19, 7:33 pm, Fuz <softnfuzzyr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm referring to the following proposal:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2979.html
>
> I've noticed that the proposed lightweight <move> header has not made
> it into the FCD.
Correct.
> Does that mean we'll have to continue to include <utility> (or worse,
<algorithm>)
> in order to swap objects?
You are required to include <utility> in order to get access to
the two swap function templates.
> Is there still a chance of this proposal making it into C++0x?
This depends. It would, if some (convincing) NB comment
is added that says so.
HTH & Greetings from Bremen,
Daniel Kr=FCgler
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Author: Fabio Fracassi <f.fracassi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:59:03 CST Raw View
On 21 Apr., 20:29, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?=
<daniel.krueg...@googlemail.c=.om> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 7:33 pm, Fuz <softnfuzzyr...@googlemail.com> wrote:> I'm
referring to the following proposal:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2979.html
>
[...]
> > Is there still a chance of this proposal making it into C++0x?
>
> This depends. It would, if some (convincing) NB comment
> is added that says so.
>
Note that Anthony Williams has offered to make NB comments for all who
contact him via:
http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk/cplusplus/c++0x-now-at-fcd.html
HTH
Fabio
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]