Hi,
I noticed that the section that used to define reference collapsing
(14.4.1:4) has been removed from FCD. Does this mean reference
collapsing is no longer applicable, or is there any new place in the
standard that defines it?

Regards,
&rzej

--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

On 9 Apr., 19:57, restor <akrze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the section that used to define reference collapsing
> (14.4.1:4) has been removed from FCD. Does this mean reference
> collapsing is no longer applicable, or is there any new place in the
> standard that defines it?

No, they still exist, but core issue 988 lead to some
reorganization of the normative wording. See [dcl.ref]/6 in
N3090 for the new wording.

HTH & Greetings from Bremen,

Daniel Kr=FCgler


--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= wrote:
>
> No, they still exist, but core issue 988 lead to some
> reorganization of the normative wording. See [dcl.ref]/6 in
> N3090 for the new wording.

I think he means N3092 (the FCD), and [dcl.ref]/6 is 8.3.2/6 in that document.

Like you, I was surprised to see it get moved from clause 14 to clause 8.

Scott

--
* My training materials now available for commercial
(http://tinyurl.com/yfzvkp9) or personal use
(http://tinyurl.com/yl5ka5p).

[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Scott Meyers wrote:

> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= wrote:
>
>>
>> No, they still exist, but core issue 988 lead to some
>> reorganization of the normative wording. See [dcl.ref]/6 in
>> N3090 for the new wording.
>>
>
> I think he means N3092 (the FCD), and [dcl.ref]/6 is 8.3.2/6 in that
> document.
>
>
N3090 and N3092 are the same except for the cover page and the change markup
that's in N3090.

--
 Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of
"The Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference"
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

On 12 Apr., 20:07, Scott Meyers <NeverR...@aristeia.com> wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= wrote:
>
> > No, they still exist, but core issue 988 lead to some
> > reorganization of the normative wording. See [dcl.ref]/6 in
> > N3090 for the new wording.
>
> I think he means N3092 (the FCD), and [dcl.ref]/6 is 8.3.2/6 in that
document.
>
> Like you, I was surprised to see it get moved from clause 14 to clause 8.

N3090 should have the same effective text content/numbering
as the FCD. In addition to the FCD it also shows change
deltas via different colors.

Greetings from Bremen,

Daniel Kr=FCgler


--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use
mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu<std-c%2B%2B@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]