Topic: Did anything happen with N2904 this week?
Author: Scott Meyers <usenet@aristeia.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:26:51 CST Raw View
I'd be interested in a summary of what happened in Santa Cruz this week,
but I'm
especially interested to know what, if anything, was decided wrt N2904, the
proposal to make move operations special (i.e., automatically generated)
member
functions in C++0x.
Thanks,
Scott
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]
Author: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:12:44 CST Raw View
On Oct 25, 12:26 am, Scott Meyers <use...@aristeia.com> wrote:
> I'd be interested in a summary of what happened in Santa Cruz this week,
> but I'm
> especially interested to know what, if anything, was decided wrt N2904, the
> proposal to make move operations special (i.e., automatically generated)
> member
> functions in C++0x.
The Evolution Working Group moved that paper (or an updated version of
it) forward,
it's currently in-progress in the Core Working Group to review and
fine-tune the wording.
--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]