Topic: 2008-12 mailing available, plus core issues list rev 60 and library issues list rev 61


Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Keld_J=F8rn?= Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:44:06 CST
Raw View
The 2008-12 mailing, plus core issues list rev 60 and library
issues list rev 61 are now available from the C++ committee web site at
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/

best regards
Keld

--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]





Author: Gennaro Prota <gennaro/prota@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:34:56 CST
Raw View
Keld J   rn Simonsen wrote:
>
> The 2008-12 mailing, plus core issues list rev 60 and library
> issues list rev 61 are now available from the C++ committee web site at
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/

Just a question: is the technical content of n2800 the same as
the previous working draft (n2798)?

Thanks.

--
 Gennaro Prota         |           name.surname yahoo.com
   Breeze C++ (preview): <https://sourceforge.net/projects/breeze/>
   Do you need expertise in C++?   I'm available.


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]





Author: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:54:17 CST
Raw View
On Dec 16, 7:34 am, Gennaro Prota <gennaro/pr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Keld J rn Simonsen wrote:
>
> > The 2008-12 mailing, plus core issues list rev 60 and library
> > issues list rev 61 are now available from the C++ committee web site at
> >http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
>
> Just a question: is the technical content of n2800 the same as
> the previous working draft (n2798)?
>
> Thanks.

I asked Pete Becker recently exactly the same question and
he confirmed that n2800 is not different from n2798 based on the
technical content (He used different words, but this is my
interpretation of them).

Greetings from Bremen,

Daniel Kr   gler




--
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]





Author: Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:21:32 CST
Raw View
On 2008-12-15 19:34:56 -0500, Gennaro Prota <gennaro/prota@yahoo.com> said:

> Keld J   rn Simonsen wrote:
>>
>> The 2008-12 mailing, plus core issues list rev 60 and library
>> issues list rev 61 are now available from the C++ committee web site at
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
>
> Just a question: is the technical content of n2800 the same as
> the previous working draft (n2798)?
>

Yes, of course. That's what the C++ committee approved.

--
 Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)



[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@netlab.cs.rpi.edu]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]