On Mon, 14 May 2007 16:42:39 GMT, "Bo Persson" wrote:

>Some nitpicking.  :-)
>
>Clause 17 uses the phrase "clauses 18 through 27, and Annex D", in numerous
>places, to refer to the library part of the standard. However, there are now
>more than 27 clauses in the current draft.
>
>
>In 17.4.1.2 [headers] tables 13 and 14 have had new header names added. The
>sentence immediately before each table states the old number of headers
>though.
>
>
>In 17.4.4.7 [derivation], in the second but last bullet, the word
>non-virtual appears as virtual "" non-. A make-up error, or perhaps a pdf
>conversion problem?

I replied to this long ago and I don't think the post was rejected but
it didn't show either :-) Well, the point was: why not removing the
hardcoded numbers altogether? Note that, in the case of the header
tables there have already been problems in the past: see the final
paragraph of this post

  <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/msg/25bd9ef5b569ba16>

--
Gennaro Prota -- C++ Developer, For Hire
https://sourceforge.net/projects/breeze/

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Some nitpicking.  :-)

Clause 17 uses the phrase "clauses 18 through 27, and Annex D", in numerous
places, to refer to the library part of the standard. However, there are now
more than 27 clauses in the current draft.


In 17.4.1.2 [headers] tables 13 and 14 have had new header names added. The
sentence immediately before each table states the old number of headers
though.


In 17.4.4.7 [derivation], in the second but last bullet, the word
non-virtual appears as virtual "" non-. A make-up error, or perhaps a pdf
conversion problem?



Bo Persson


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

Bo Persson wrote:
> Some nitpicking.  :-)
>
> Clause 17 uses the phrase "clauses 18 through 27, and Annex D", in numerous
> places, to refer to the library part of the standard. However, there are now
> more than 27 clauses in the current draft.
>
>
> In 17.4.1.2 [headers] tables 13 and 14 have had new header names added. The
> sentence immediately before each table states the old number of headers
> though.
>
>
> In 17.4.4.7 [derivation], in the second but last bullet, the word
> non-virtual appears as virtual "" non-. A make-up error, or perhaps a pdf
> conversion problem?
>

Noted, thanks. In general, please send editorial fixes to
editorial@versatilecoding.com.

--

 -- Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com)
Author of "The Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and
Reference." (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]