Topic: C90 Amendment 1 (<wchar.h> etc.)


Author: "Richard Smith" <richard@ex-parrot.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:47:35 CST
Raw View
Can anyone suggest where I can get hold of a copy of ISO/IEC 9899:1990/
Amd.1:1995, the C90 amendment that  introduced the <wchar.h> and
<wctype.h> headers?  I've tried the ISO, BSI and ANSI online stores,
and emailing the BSI; I've even tried the Cambridge University Library
(a UK copyright library, so it ought to have a copy, though finding
documents with obscure numeric titles like this is rather fraught),
all without success.

As the current C++ standard describes those two headers by reference
to C90 Amd.1, it's a bit of a nuisance that it's so hard to obtain.
Is there any intention to update the current C++0x working paper to
define these parts of the standard library by reference to C99
instead?

--
Richard Smith

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]





Author: jackklein@spamcop.net (Jack Klein)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:53:32 GMT
Raw View
On Tue,  6 Feb 2007 09:47:35 CST, "Richard Smith"
<richard@ex-parrot.com> wrote in comp.std.c++:

> Can anyone suggest where I can get hold of a copy of ISO/IEC 9899:1990/
> Amd.1:1995, the C90 amendment that  introduced the <wchar.h> and
> <wctype.h> headers?  I've tried the ISO, BSI and ANSI online stores,
> and emailing the BSI; I've even tried the Cambridge University Library
> (a UK copyright library, so it ought to have a copy, though finding
> documents with obscure numeric titles like this is rather fraught),
> all without success.
>
> As the current C++ standard describes those two headers by reference
> to C90 Amd.1, it's a bit of a nuisance that it's so hard to obtain.
> Is there any intention to update the current C++0x working paper to
> define these parts of the standard library by reference to C99
> instead?

Go to http://www.techstreet.com/incitsgate.tmpl and type 9899 in the
search box.

Sixth item on the list is "CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC  9899A-97  18-Jan-2000
Amendment 1:1997 to CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 9899-94 - Programming Languages -
C - AMENDMENT 1: C Integrity (Adopted Amendment 1:1995 to ISO/IEC
9899:1990)"  $91.00 for either printed copy or PDF.

I do not have this document and I have not seen this document, so I
can make no recommendation as to whether or not it will meet your
needs.

--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~ajo/docs/FAQ-acllc.html

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]