Javier, I was hoping for the facilitating of AOP in the upcoming
standard as well.  However, the only references I've found of it was in
a 2 year old background document for starting up a conversation about
reflection in C++.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1751.html

I think it's unfortunate that AOP doesn't seem to really have been
discussed.
I search though the group brought up only 5 references going back to at
least 2002.

Do any members of the committee have any opinions on AOP/information?



Javier wrote:
> I've followed up for over two years with interest a development in
> http://www.aspectc.org where aspects are being integrated into the C++
> language via an aspects compiler.
>
> Given that the standards committee is taking proposals for TR2, and
> that such proposals address from garbage collection, threading,
> networking, what are the thoughts of this group on aspects for C++?
>
> I've encouraged Olaf Spinczyk, one of the authors of the aspects
> compiler, to submit a proposal--hopefully he's reading this post--or
> Boost-ify it, albeit Boost is standards-compliant.
>
> I guess that if aspects "pass muster" in this group than there would be
> value in their incorporation in our day-to-day programming.
>
> I apologize if I don't reply timely during the holidays :-)
>
> Regards.
>
> ---
> [ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
> [ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
> [              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
> [ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]

I've followed up for over two years with interest a development in
http://www.aspectc.org where aspects are being integrated into the C++
language via an aspects compiler.

Given that the standards committee is taking proposals for TR2, and
that such proposals address from garbage collection, threading,
networking, what are the thoughts of this group on aspects for C++?

I've encouraged Olaf Spinczyk, one of the authors of the aspects
compiler, to submit a proposal--hopefully he's reading this post--or
Boost-ify it, albeit Boost is standards-compliant.

I guess that if aspects "pass muster" in this group than there would be
value in their incorporation in our day-to-day programming.

I apologize if I don't reply timely during the holidays :-)

Regards.

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html                      ]