Topic: Mod policy & return addresses (was: C++ Embraces Procedural Programming
Author: alfps@start.no ("Alf P. Steinbach")
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 06:11:50 GMT Raw View
* Frederick Gotham:
>
> [ We'll soon have to move this discussion to an unmoderated newsgroup --
> comp.std.c++ is far too censored. ]
If the csc++ moderators allow, springing out of an already way off-topic
thread ;-), if an article of yours is rejected from a moderated group,
do you actually receive the rejection notice at [fgothamNO@SPAM.com]?
My interest in this is of course partly on what the quoted statement
rests, i.e. the csc++ moderation policy: have you actually experienced
/censorship/ in csc++?
But also my interest is partly as a moderator of another group, namely
clc++m, where for addresses of that form I wouldn't want to use ten or
fifteen minutes composing a non-offensive but clarifying rejection
reason if the poster won't actually receive the rejection notice.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.comeaucomputing.com/csc/faq.html ]