Topic: Accepting Library issue #409 on fstream should revoke issue #22
Author: bop@gmb.dk ("Bo Persson")
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:17:06 GMT Raw View
This is not a real defect report, as it affects the current draft
only.
Library issue #22 added footnotes 324 & 325, explaining that "A
successful open does not change the error state" of the stream.
Issue #409, however, now says that a successful open() in fact DOES
call clear(), which resets the error state.
This is a contradiction.
Bo Persson
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: howard.hinnant@gmail.com (Howard Hinnant)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:53:08 GMT Raw View
In article <42kvuuF1jsr38U1@individual.net>, bop@gmb.dk ("Bo Persson")
wrote:
> This is not a real defect report, as it affects the current draft
> only.
>
> Library issue #22 added footnotes 324 & 325, explaining that "A
> successful open does not change the error state" of the stream.
>
> Issue #409, however, now says that a successful open() in fact DOES
> call clear(), which resets the error state.
>
> This is a contradiction.
Haven't you heard? We're the standard with a sense of humor! :-)
Thanks Bo, I'll open an issue for this one. At least you caught it
before the WD is set in stone. :-)
-Howard
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]