Topic: signbit, lrint (TR1?)
Author: tmartsum@gmail.com
Date: 27 Sep 2005 02:00:22 GMT Raw View
Are things like signbit and lrint going to be a part of standard C++
(stl) ?
(and eventually when)
/Thorbj rn
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: pjp@dinkumware.com ("P.J. Plauger")
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:21:37 GMT Raw View
<tmartsum@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127731401.506310.46460@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Are things like signbit and lrint going to be a part of standard C++
> (stl) ?
> (and eventually when)
They're already in TR1, the first library TR, which is in the
final stages of approval. TR1 is non-normative, but should be
widely accepted. And it's a serious candidate for inclusion in
the next formal revision of Standard C++ (aka C++0X).
The C/C++ library we license at our web site already integrates
these functions with C++, and has done so for several years.
P.J. Plauger
Dinkumware, Ltd.
http://www.dinkumware.com
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: petebecker@acm.org (Pete Becker)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:22:12 GMT Raw View
tmartsum@gmail.com wrote:
> Are things like signbit and lrint going to be a part of standard C++
> (stl) ?
> (and eventually when)
>
They're in TR1, and will almost certainly become part of C++0x.
--
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]