Topic: Not addressing something in a language Was: std::string vs. Unicode


Author: house@usq.edu.au (Ron House)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:20:06 GMT
Raw View
P.J. Plauger wrote:

> I see uses for a whole collection of Unicode encodings, so I think
> the C and C++ Standards got it right in decoupling encodings from
> their respective languages. But you then need an add-on library
> to finish the job. (See, for example, our CoreX library.)

In what way is this not the same stance that was taken by the designers
of Algol 60 re I-O, and which arguably resulted in the demise of Algol?

--
Ron House     house@usq.edu.au
               http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/house

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]