Throughout the C++ standard, "convertible to X" mean exactly? does the
conversion have to be implicit? It seems strange that such a frequently
used term is exactly defined (unless I missed it, or am just being
unnessasarily pendantic)

Chris

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]