Topic: Error when compiling with Cygwin
Author: llewelly.at@xmission.dot.com (llewelly)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:31:45 GMT Raw View
stephen.clamage@sun.com (Steve Clamage) writes:
> jive wrote:
>>>"Rolf Magnus" <ramagnus@t-online.de> wrote in message news:cgk967$soo$00
>>>$1@news.t-online.com...
>>>jive wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The last C++ standard version is from 2003, but except for a few
>>>>minor corrections, it's the same as C++98.
>>>
>>>AFAIK there is only a draft, as the standardisation process is still
>>>incomplete and new revision of the C++ standard is supposedly due this
>>>fall.
>>>
>>>See:
>>>http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?
>>>CSNUMBER=38110
>> Strange.. I found no mention about this on
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ and this
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1638.pdf outdates
>> the one available on the ISO site.
>> Could someone comment on that?
>> - jive
>
> The C++ Committee worked on addressing errors in the original 1998 C++
> standard (see this newsgroup's FAQ list about Defect Reports), and is
> now working on a future C++ standard.
>
> A Technical Report (TR1) was released containing fixes to Defect
I could've sworn that was called Techical *Corrigendum* 1 ... Am I
wrong?
> Reports. The TR was folded into a new version of the C++ standard,
> dated 2003. That is now the official standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2003). It
> is available for purchase from ISO (at the above addres), from
> www.ansi.org, and from www.incits.org.
[snip]
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: stephen.clamage@sun.com (Steve Clamage)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:29:42 GMT Raw View
llewelly wrote:
> stephen.clamage@sun.com (Steve Clamage) writes:
>
>>The C++ Committee worked on addressing errors in the original 1998 C++
>>standard (see this newsgroup's FAQ list about Defect Reports), and is
>>now working on a future C++ standard.
>>
>>A Technical Report (TR1) was released containing fixes to Defect
>
>
> I could've sworn that was called Techical *Corrigendum* 1 ... Am I
> wrong?
You are correct. I mis-spoke. The correction is TC1, folded into the
2003 version of the standard.
---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@sun.com
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: jive@nospam.invalid ("jive")
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:42:40 GMT Raw View
> "Rolf Magnus" <ramagnus@t-online.de> wrote in message news:cgk967$soo$00
> $1@news.t-online.com...
> jive wrote:
>
> > The last C++ standard version is from 2003, but except for a few
> > minor corrections, it's the same as C++98.
>
> AFAIK there is only a draft, as the standardisation process is still
> incomplete and new revision of the C++ standard is supposedly due this
> fall.
>
> See:
> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?
> CSNUMBER=38110
Strange.. I found no mention about this on
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ and this
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1638.pdf outdates
the one available on the ISO site.
Could someone comment on that?
- jive
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: stephen.clamage@sun.com (Steve Clamage)
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:00:33 GMT Raw View
jive wrote:
>>"Rolf Magnus" <ramagnus@t-online.de> wrote in message news:cgk967$soo$00
>>$1@news.t-online.com...
>>jive wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The last C++ standard version is from 2003, but except for a few
>>>minor corrections, it's the same as C++98.
>>
>>AFAIK there is only a draft, as the standardisation process is still
>>incomplete and new revision of the C++ standard is supposedly due this
>>fall.
>>
>>See:
>>http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?
>>CSNUMBER=38110
>
>
> Strange.. I found no mention about this on
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ and this
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1638.pdf outdates
> the one available on the ISO site.
>
> Could someone comment on that?
>
> - jive
The C++ Committee worked on addressing errors in the original 1998 C++
standard (see this newsgroup's FAQ list about Defect Reports), and is
now working on a future C++ standard.
A Technical Report (TR1) was released containing fixes to Defect
Reports. The TR was folded into a new version of the C++ standard,
dated 2003. That is now the official standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2003). It
is available for purchase from ISO (at the above addres), from
www.ansi.org, and from www.incits.org.
In the process of creating a standard (or TR), the committee creates
many drafts, carefully labeled as drafts. The n1638.pdf paper is one
example.
These drafts have no official weight. They are known to contain errors
and inconsistencies, and to be incomplete. In fact these drafts say so
on the first page!
---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@sun.com
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]