Hallo,
I'm curious about why operator ->* isn't defined in terms of operator *
and operator .* where operator overloading is concerned, in analogy with
how the overloading of operator -> works.

I read previous messages about implementations and workarounds, but I
couldn't find an explanation of the rationale behind this decision.

Cheers,
Nicola Musatti


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]