Topic: minor glitch in standard numeric_limits


Author: ron@sensor.com ("Ron Natalie")
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:16:34 +0000 (UTC)
Raw View
The description in 18.2.1.2 for min_denorm references the has_denorm value
comparing it to false.   has_denorm is an enum (suspect it was possibly a
bool at an earlier state).    For consistency it should probalby say has_denorm
== denorm_absent, rather than false.   Of course, it's technically correct now
since both have value 0.

Ron


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]