Topic: comp.std.c++ report for Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003
Author: jdennett@acm.org (James Dennett)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
Allan W wrote:
> fjh+csc-admin@cs.mu.OZ.AU wrote
>
>>Subject: comp.std.c++ report for Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003
>
>
>>Lastly, the statistics below are skewed towards higher numbers because
>>there are always some test messages from moderators themselves who
>>approve and reject them to make sure that our robomoderator functions
>>properly.
>
>
> How many test messages were there last month? A ballpark guess, even.
> I ask because I never did notice a test message that had been approved.
> Just because I didn't notice it, doesn't mean it didn't exist, but I'm
> curious how many there were.
>
> Or, would it be fair to say that the moderators don't send test messages
> every month?
It's fair. We do not usually send test messages.
There are enough real messages to show up problems
when they arise.
-- James.
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: allan_w@my-dejanews.com (Allan W)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
fjh+csc-admin@cs.mu.OZ.AU wrote
> Subject: comp.std.c++ report for Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003
> Lastly, the statistics below are skewed towards higher numbers because
> there are always some test messages from moderators themselves who
> approve and reject them to make sure that our robomoderator functions
> properly.
How many test messages were there last month? A ballpark guess, even.
I ask because I never did notice a test message that had been approved.
Just because I didn't notice it, doesn't mean it didn't exist, but I'm
curious how many there were.
Or, would it be fair to say that the moderators don't send test messages
every month?
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: fjh+csc-admin@cs.mu.OZ.AU
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
Subject: comp.std.c++ report for Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Date: Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003
This is an automated report about activity of our newsgroup
comp.std.c++. It covers period between the
previous report and the current one, ending
on Sat Mar 1 00:05:01 EST 2003.
Note that we do not report the number of articles cancelled
after they got approved, because the cancellations are done
manually. Typically messages get cancelled by requests of
posters themselves.
Lastly, the statistics below are skewed towards higher numbers because
there are always some test messages from moderators themselves who
approve and reject them to make sure that our robomoderator functions
properly.
Approved: 446 messages (of them, 0 automatically)
Rejected: 35 messages
Preapproved: 0 new posters
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]