Topic: Providing local classes with external linkage
Author: google@vandevoorde.com (Daveed Vandevoorde)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
fvali@eecs.ku.edu (faisal vali) wrote:
> Can anyone update me as to how Anthony Williams' proposal "Local Classes
> and Linkage" was received by the standard's committee?
It has not (yet) been discussed among core WG (working
group) members. It might have been discussed by the
extensions WG, but not while I was present.
Daveed
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: francis.glassborow@ntlworld.com (Francis Glassborow)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
In article <52f2f9cd.0211221345.2a614f9a@posting.google.com>, Daveed
Vandevoorde <google@vandevoorde.com> writes
>fvali@eecs.ku.edu (faisal vali) wrote:
>> Can anyone update me as to how Anthony Williams' proposal "Local Classes
>> and Linkage" was received by the standard's committee?
>
>It has not (yet) been discussed among core WG (working
>group) members. It might have been discussed by the
>extensions WG, but not while I was present.
It wasn't. And that means that we did not have a paper proposing it.
WG21 & J16 require a 'paper' trail for all work. Until that exists we do
not look.
--
Francis Glassborow ACCU
64 Southfield Rd
Oxford OX4 1PA +44(0)1865 246490
All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: cpdaniel@pacbell.net ("Carl Daniel")
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 01:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
"Francis Glassborow" <francis.glassborow@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:xrkNMTGqN239EwxU@robinton.demon.co.uk...
> In article <52f2f9cd.0211221345.2a614f9a@posting.google.com>, Daveed
> Vandevoorde <google@vandevoorde.com> writes
> >fvali@eecs.ku.edu (faisal vali) wrote:
> >> Can anyone update me as to how Anthony Williams' proposal "Local
Classes
> >> and Linkage" was received by the standard's committee?
> >
> >It has not (yet) been discussed among core WG (working
> >group) members. It might have been discussed by the
> >extensions WG, but not while I was present.
>
> It wasn't. And that means that we did not have a paper proposing it.
> WG21 & J16 require a 'paper' trail for all work. Until that exists we do
> not look.
What about
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1353.html?
It appears that the paper has been around since before Curacao and yet has
never been discussed?
-cd
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: francis.glassborow@ntlworld.com (Francis Glassborow)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
In article <TwVD9.3582$2D6.133191790@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, Carl
Daniel <cpdaniel@pacbell.net> writes
>What about
>http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1353.html?
>
>It appears that the paper has been around since before Curacao and yet has
>never been discussed?
I suspect that may be the problem. It was, in a sense, premature. It
probably needs rewriting to conform with the evolution guidelines.
However, even in its present form it would seem to merit attention at
the next (Oxford) meeting.
--
Francis Glassborow ACCU
64 Southfield Rd
Oxford OX4 1PA +44(0)1865 246490
All opinions are mine and do not represent those of any organisation
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: fvali@eecs.ku.edu (faisal vali)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
Can anyone update me as to how Anthony Williams' proposal "Local Classes
and Linkage" was received by the standard's committee?
I ask because those proposed features are features that I would very
much like to see in the next version of C++ (since , if accepted, they
would prevent unnecessary namespace pollution when writing our own
functors).
A link to the proposal for all those interested in this topic:
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1353.html
regards,
-fas
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]