Topic: Move semantics in C++ - what does the committee think?
Author: dave@boost-consulting.com (David Abrahams)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
cpdaniel@pacbell.net ("Carl Daniel") writes:
> The document at
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm does a fine
> job of describing a well thought-out proposal for adding move semantics to
> C++. In fact, after reading this document, I'm quite upset that we don't
> already have this support in the language!
>
> I'm curious what sort of discussion has gone on in the committee about this
> proposal. Are members generally in favor of it? Have any implementors
> other than Metrowerks implemented all or part of this proposal?
Not much AFAIK. Wait a few weeks 'till we've had a chance to meet ;-)
--
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
Author: cpdaniel@pacbell.net ("Carl Daniel")
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Raw View
The document at
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm does a fine
job of describing a well thought-out proposal for adding move semantics to
C++. In fact, after reading this document, I'm quite upset that we don't
already have this support in the language!
I'm curious what sort of discussion has gone on in the committee about this
proposal. Are members generally in favor of it? Have any implementors
other than Metrowerks implemented all or part of this proposal?
-cd
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
[ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]