gdr@soliton.integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) writes:

> See the note in 9.3/5.

Interestingly enough, the example of the OP nearly literally came from
9.3/5...

Regards,
Martin

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]

If I have the following file:

struct X {
  typedef int T;
  void f( T t );
};

typedef float T;

void X::f( T t ) {
}

Is this well defined C++.  If so, to what type does T resolve?  Can someone
refer me to the standard passage on the subject?

Thanks!
Tanton


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]

"tanton@bellsouth.net"@bellsouth.net ("Tanton Gibbs") writes:

| If I have the following file:
|
| struct X {
|   typedef int T;
|   void f( T t );
| };
|
| typedef float T;
|
| void X::f( T t ) {
| }
|
| Is this well defined C++.

Yes.

| If so, to what type does T resolve?

The "T" in the definition of X::f resolves to X::T, i.e. int.

|  Can someone
| refer me to the standard passage on the subject?

See the note in 9.3/5.

--
Gabriel Dos Reis                    gdr@integrable-solutions.net

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]