Topic: Defect Reports


Author: Michiel Salters <salters@lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:32:07 GMT
Raw View
Jack Klein wrote:

> Is there any publicly accessible site where I can see what (if any)
> defect reports have been filed against the current standard?  I have
> some issues I want to file DRs about, but not if they have already
> been filed.

> I assume I would file DRs through my national standards body (ANSI),
> rather than directly to ISO.  Is this correct?

> Thanks,
> Jack

Quoting from the FAQ (URL follows):

Section B:

13.What is a defect report?

ISO (the International Organization for Standardization), which is ultimately
responsible for the C++ standard) has a single mechanism called Defect Reports
for reporting problems and asking for interpretations.
...
14.How are defect reports handled?
...
As a procedural matter, a submission is known inside the Committee as an "issue",
until it is either closed or elevated to DR status. Two lists of issues and DRs
currently before the Committee are now available on two public Web sites:
         http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
         http://www.comeaucomputing.com/iso/

 The dk site is the official public web page for the C++ committee.
...
15.How do I submit a defect report?
...
If you believe you have found a defect, first review the lists on the web site
to be sure it has not already been submitted. It wastes everyone's time
(including yours) to process duplicate reports.
...
Assuming your defect is not already in the lists, the simplest way to submit a DR
is via the moderated Usenet newsgroup comp.std.c++. The moderators of that newsgroup
have agreed to act as a preliminary filter, and forward reasonable-looking DRs to the
C++ Committee for consideration.
...

There's more in the FAQ, but I think this answers your questions.

(moderators, in general, are FAQuestions rejected? Some groups do, but
 the moderation policy of c.s.c++ says nothing about it.)

Michiel Salters

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.research.att.com/~austern/csc/faq.html                ]
[ Note that the FAQ URL has changed!  Please update your bookmarks.     ]





Author: Jack Klein <jackklein@spamcop.net>
Date: 26 Oct 00 06:15:23 GMT
Raw View
Is there any publicly accessible site where I can see what (if any)
defect reports have been filed against the current standard?  I have
some issues I want to file DRs about, but not if they have already
been filed.

I assume I would file DRs through my national standards body (ANSI),
rather than directly to ISO.  Is this correct?

Thanks,
Jack
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]




Author: Jim Hyslop <jim.hyslop@leitch.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:07:24 GMT
Raw View
In article <Olf2OScZ1Z0kRlj0Rpo6JK4=M=e5@4ax.com>,
  Jack Klein <jackklein@spamcop.net> wrote:
> Is there any publicly accessible site where I can see what (if any)
> defect reports have been filed against the current standard?  I have
> some issues I want to file DRs about, but not if they have already
> been filed.

http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/

Follow the links to the "Core Issues List" or the "Library Issues List",
depending on which part of the standard applies.

> I assume I would file DRs through my national standards body (ANSI),
> rather than directly to ISO.  Is this correct?
You could, or you could post a message here. FAQ B.15 contains detailed
instructions on how to format the DR. The moderators kindly provide a
link to the FAQ on the moderators' auto-appended trailer.

(BTW, Jack, I'm surprised you didn't check the FAQ first - twenty lashes
with a wet noodle for you! :-)

--
Jim
This message was posted using plain text only.  Any hyperlinks you may
see were added by other parties without my permission.
I do not endorse any products or services that may be hyperlinked to
this message.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.research.att.com/~austern/csc/faq.html                ]
[ Note that the FAQ URL has changed!  Please update your bookmarks.     ]





Author: jayz@best.no.spam.com (Jay)
Date: 1998/12/06
Raw View
Now that the C++ standard has been finalized, how long does it take for
defect reports to be reviewed/resolved? In particular, I am thinking of
this reference to a defect report on Bjarne Stroustrup's web page
<http://www.research.att.com/~bs/3rd_issues.html>

   "Due to an unfortunate oversight, the standard simply bans default
   arguments for template parameters for a function template. I have
   submitted a defect report on this."

Also, have any compiler vendors implemented "default arguments for
template parameters for a function template" as a C++ extension, or in
anticipation of a favorable resolution to this reported defect?

--
(Remove ".no.spam" from e-mail address to reply)


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]