>> Anyway, there's no need to find fault with your definition, because
>> EC++ fails it by providing some features differently from the way
>> C++ provides them, and other features that C++ does not provide at
>> all.

(I think this question was discussed a few months ago on comp.std.c++,
but I never saw a definitive answer.)

BTW, does EC++ have a uniquely predefined preprocessor name that can
be used for conditional compilation (such as __ecplusplus), or does
it simply not predefine __cplusplus?

-- David R. Tribble, david@tribble.com --
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]

David R Tribble wrote:
>
> BTW, does EC++ have a uniquely predefined preprocessor name that can
> be used for conditional compilation (such as __ecplusplus), or does
> it simply not predefine __cplusplus?
>

Yes: __embedded_cplusplus. See
http://www.caravan.net/ec2plus/amendment2.html.

--
Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd.
http://www.dinkumware.com

      [ Send an empty e-mail to c++-help@netlab.cs.rpi.edu for info ]
      [ about comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: do this! ]

[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]