Whilst trying to find the answer to a question in our sister group
comp.lang.c++.moderated, I read Table 61 (page 437, subclause
22.2.2.2.2). I think there's a typo in the fourth line, which reads

adjustfield == internal and representation after stage 1 began with 0x
1or 0X

(That might have been "lor" rather than "1or", but either way I think
it's a typo for the conjunction "or".)

--
There's no need to e-mail me a copy of a follow-up; but if you do,
please identify it as such.

Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                                    http://www.mindspring.com/~brahms/
My reply address is correct as is. The courtesy of providing a correct
reply address is more important to me than time spent deleting spam.


[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html              ]