Our ostream header declares operator<<(ostream&,void*) but has a declaration
for operator<<(ostream&, const void*) commented out.  Another implementation
for a later version of the same OS has only operator<<(ostream&,void*).  The
writeup in the (April) DWP has only the void* output operator as well.

Would it make sense to add operator<<(ostream&,const void*) ?
If not, why not?

--
John Hickin      Nortel Technology, Montreal, Quebec
(514) 765-7924   hickin@nortel.ca



[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles: try just posting with      ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu         ]
[ FAQ:      http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html    ]
[ Policy:   http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
[ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu                             ]