Topic: delete this
Author: Earl Chew <earl@hpato.aus.hp.com>
Date: 1996/02/02 Raw View
I believe that `delete this' is "unsafe".
Does the draft standard say this explicitly?
Where?
Earl
--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Earl Chew Email: earl_chew@aus.hp.com |
| Hewlett-Packard Australia Ltd Tel: +61 3 9210 5528 |
| Australian Telecom Operation Fax: +61 3 9210 5550 |
| 347 Burwood Highway GPS: 37 48'44"S 145 8'51"E |
| Burwood East, Victoria 3151, Australia |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is
summarized in http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html
]
Author: "Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip.org/" <ncm@cantrip.org>
Date: 1996/02/05 Raw View
Earl Chew wrote:
>
> I believe that `delete this' is "unsafe".
>
> Does the draft standard say this explicitly?
The Draft doesn't say this, and it shouldn't say this.
The subject was discussed in committee. The construct is
used in plenty of existing code that we saw no reason to break.
It has also been discussed in this newsgroup at length.
For the record, I use "delete this" often. It works admirably,
in the right context. I don't use it anywhere else.
Nathan Myers
ncm@cantrip.org http://www.cantrip.org/
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is
summarized in http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html
]