Topic: Scope of fwd declaratoins of nested classes
Author: gnb@bby.com.au (Gregory Bond)
Date: 1995/12/14 Raw View
Try this for a corner case:
class A {
public:
class B;
private:
class B {
public:
int b;
};
};
// Is A::B visible here? Or is the above declaration ill-formed?
// I.e. is the scope of A::B established when it is declared or when
// it is defined? or should the two scopes be the same?
// FWIW, g++ 2.7.1 thinks this is well-formed and A::B is visible.
--
Gregory Bond <gnb@bby.com.au> Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd Melbourne Australia
``Efforts to maintain the "purity" of a language only succeed in establishing an
elite class of people who know the shibboleths. Ordinary folks know better,
even if they don't know what "shibboleth" means.'' - Larry Wall
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy
is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]