In article <4apjod$7tp@engnews1.eng.sun.com>, clamage@Eng.Sun.Com (Steve Clamage) writes:
|> In article 95Dec14120500@dame.bby.com.au, gnb@bby.com.au (Gregory Bond) writes:
|> >
|> >class A {
|> >  public:
|> > class B;
|> >  private:
|> > class B {
|> >   public:
|> >  int b;
|> > };
|> >};
|>
|> An example just like yours appears in the draft to illustrate the error.

The only way I see to hide the definition of a public nested class
is to put it into a different translation unit.

// public header
class A {
    public:
 class B;
};

// implementation file for class A
class A::B {
    public:
 int b;
};


Ulf Schuenemann

--------------------------------------------------------------------
 ,_.   Ulf Schuenemann
#,  \  Fakultaet fuer Informatik, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany.
 |   > email: schuenem@informatik.tu-muenchen.de
 v=-<  WWW:   http://hphalle2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~schuenem/


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]