jim.fleming@bytes.com (Jim Fleming) writes:

>In article <3t8vur$f8k@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>, stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu says...
>>
>>jim.fleming@bytes.com (Jim Fleming) writes:
>>[Text deleted]
>>
>>>Could you exaplain the basis for your comments above?
>>
>>The sum of all previous postings from you!

>Have you verified all of the information that you posted...?

Obviously far more than you EVER have!.

Do us all a favor Jim, PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS MESSAGE!

Thank You!

--
Rick Stanley                         |              RSI
stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu                |         (212) 740-6600
Information Technologies Institute   |        C++ & C Language
New York University   NYC, NY  USA   | Programming, Training, Consulting

gusw@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Gunther Schadow) writes:

>pamela_s@ruls41.LeidenUniv.nl (Pamela M. Seymour) writes:

[Jim's drivel happily deleted!]

>Huch? What's this? Someone who thinks that she has to invent a new
>programming language by adding a mysterious operator @ to C++?

>can somebody explain?

For those of you who have not learned about Jim Fleming, this was just a
sample of the Net-clogging garbage posted by a person who is unfairly
prejuduced against C++ in favor of another language called C+@ (pronounced
cat).  C+@ was created by AT&T and by a defunct company called Unir.

Such postings should be ignored.

This newsgroup is dedicated to the discussion of the C++ Programming
language.  Discussion of all other topics, should be directed to the
appropriate newsgroups.

Please do not respond to this message.


--
Rick Stanley                         |              RSI
stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu                |         (212) 740-6600
Information Technologies Institute   |        C++ & C Language
New York University   NYC, NY  USA   | Programming, Training, Consulting

In article <3t3jvj$9nk@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>, stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu says...
>
>gusw@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Gunther Schadow) writes:
>
>>pamela_s@ruls41.LeidenUniv.nl (Pamela M. Seymour) writes:
>
>[Jim's drivel happily deleted!]
>
>>Huch? What's this? Someone who thinks that she has to invent a new
>>programming language by adding a mysterious operator @ to C++?
>
>>can somebody explain?
>
>For those of you who have not learned about Jim Fleming, this was just a
>sample of the Net-clogging garbage posted by a person who is unfairly
>prejuduced against C++ in favor of another language called C+@ (pronounced
>cat).  C+@ was created by AT&T and by a defunct company called Unir.
>
>Such postings should be ignored.
>
>This newsgroup is dedicated to the discussion of the C++ Programming
>language.  Discussion of all other topics, should be directed to the
>appropriate newsgroups.
>
>Please do not respond to this message.
>
>
>--
>Rick Stanley                         |              RSI
>stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu                |         (212) 740-6600
>Information Technologies Institute   |        C++ & C Language
>New York University   NYC, NY  USA   | Programming, Training, Consulting

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Could you exaplain the basis for your comments above?

Thanks...

--
Jim Fleming            /|\      Unir Corporation       Unir Technology, Inc.
jrf@tiger.bytes.com  /  | \     One Naperville Plaza   184 Shuman Blvd. #100
%Techno Cat I       /   |  \    Naperville, IL 60563   Naperville, IL 60563
East End, Tortola  |____|___\   1-708-505-5801         1-800-222-UNIR(8647)
British Virgin Islands__|______ 1-708-305-3277 (FAX)   1-708-305-0600
                 \__/-------\__/       http:199.3.34.13 telnet: port 5555
Smooth Sailing on Cruising C+@amarans  ftp: 199.3.34.12 <-----stargate----+
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\____to the end of the OuterNet_|

Jim Fleming (jim.fleming@bytes.com) wrote:

: In article <3t3jvj$9nk@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>, stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu says...
[...]
: >
: >For those of you who have not learned about Jim Fleming, this was just a
: >sample of the Net-clogging garbage posted by a person who is unfairly
: >prejuduced against C++ in favor of another language called C+@ (pronounced
: >cat).  C+@ was created by AT&T and by a defunct company called Unir.
: >
: >Such postings should be ignored.
: >

: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

: Could you exaplain the basis for your comments above?

: Thanks...

Heh,heh,heh.

Pam

jim.fleming@bytes.com (Jim Fleming) writes:
[Text deleted]

>Could you exaplain the basis for your comments above?

The sum of all previous postings from you!

--
Rick Stanley                         |              RSI
stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu                |         (212) 740-6600
Information Technologies Institute   |        C++ & C Language
New York University   NYC, NY  USA   | Programming, Training, Consulting

In article <3t8vur$f8k@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>, stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu says...
>
>jim.fleming@bytes.com (Jim Fleming) writes:
>[Text deleted]
>
>>Could you exaplain the basis for your comments above?
>
>The sum of all previous postings from you!
>
>--
>Rick Stanley                         |              RSI
>stanleyr@acf4.nyu.edu                |         (212) 740-6600
>Information Technologies Institute   |        C++ & C Language
>New York University   NYC, NY  USA   | Programming, Training, Consulting

@@@@@@@@@

Have you verified all of the information that you posted...?

--
Jim Fleming            /|\      Unir Corporation       Unir Technology, Inc.
jrf@tiger.bytes.com  /  | \     One Naperville Plaza   184 Shuman Blvd. #100
%Techno Cat I       /   |  \    Naperville, IL 60563   Naperville, IL 60563
East End, Tortola  |____|___\   1-708-505-5801         1-800-222-UNIR(8647)
British Virgin Islands__|______ 1-708-305-3277 (FAX)   1-708-305-0600
                 \__/-------\__/       http:199.3.34.13 telnet: port 5555
Smooth Sailing on Cruising C+@amarans  ftp: 199.3.34.12 <-----stargate----+
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\____to the end of the OuterNet_|

pamela_s@ruls41.LeidenUniv.nl (Pamela M. Seymour) writes:

>   OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
>
>     C++ WAS CONSPIRACY TO KEEP C+@ OFF THE MARKET!
>
>After long months of giggling behind our newsreaders, we want to
>officially admit that C++ and it's standardization committee were a
>gigantic hoax.
...
>* The members of the so-called C++ standardization committee for
>  keeping up appearances, and refusing to yield to the numerous
>  requests of introducing a '@' operator in C++.
...

Huch? What's this? Someone who thinks that she has to invent a new
programming language by adding a mysterious operator @ to C++?

can somebody explain?

thanks,
-Gunther Schadow
--
Gunther Schadow__________________Windsteiner Weg 54a, Berlin 14165, FR. Germany
Dept. of Anaesthesia and Operative Intensive Care Medicine/
Dept. of Medical Informatics at the           |gusw@fub46.zedat.fu-berlin.de
Universitaetsklinikum Steglitz, Berlin, FRG.  |#include <usual/disclaimer>

   OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

     C++ WAS CONSPIRACY TO KEEP C+@ OFF THE MARKET!

After long months of giggling behind our newsreaders, we want to
officially admit that C++ and it's standardization committee were a
gigantic hoax.

As we all know, C++ is a joke, and a particularly bad one at
that. However, since for some reason we just don't like Jim Fleming
and his language "C+@", we have decided to conspire and continue the C++
joke to at least prevent C+@ from ever appearing on the market as a
superior OO language.

This conspiracy seems to have worked out beautifully, for Unir is
now defunct, and there is not a single implementation of C+@
available on the market.

We apologise to all those who started programming in C++, or even
started using STL and reading the so-called DRAFT of the c++
standard. But, take heart, you all contributed to the conspiracy!

We want to express our thanks to the following people for making this
conspiracy work so effectively:

* Bjarne Stroustrup & colleagues for pretending to develop the
  C++ "language".
* The members of the so-called C++ standardization committee for
  keeping up appearances, and refusing to yield to the numerous
  requests of introducing a '@' operator in C++.
* The numerous usenet readers who nearly drove Jim Fleming mad by
  pretending to take him seriously most of the time.
* The numerous posters who supported the conspiracy by posting
  so-called questions about C++, or even (we particularly liked
  those!) pretended to actually *defend* C++ as a programming
  language.

Thanks, all of you. We had a good laugh, but the joke is finally over
now. We will of course rmgroup comp.lang.c++ and comp.std.c++ in the
near future.

Pamela M. Seymour
33rd degree Illuminatus