Does the draft standard intend for the following to be legal?

    typedef enum e {x = 1};

Section 7, "Declarations", implies that it is:

      In the general form of declaration, the optional
      init-declarator-list can be omitted only when declaring a class
      (_class_), enumeration (_dcl.enum_) or namespace
      (_namespace.def_), that is, when the decl- specifier-seq
      contains either a class-specifier, an elaborated-type- specifier
      with a class-key (_class.name_), an enum-specifier, or a
      namespace-definition.  In these cases and whenever a
      class-specifier, enum-specifier, or namespace-definition is
      present in the decl- specifier-seq, the identifiers in these
      specifiers are among the names being declared by the declaration
      (as class-names, enum-names, enumer- ators, or namespace-name,
      depending on the syntax).

This also implies that

    typedef int;

is not legal.