Topic: c@t-fka raises it's head


Author: je@bton.ac.uk (John English)
Date: 1995/06/02
Raw View
Rick Hawkins (rhawkins@iastate.edu) wrote:
: From our conversion to getting the code at some point in the future,
: jsut what are we supposed to do?  hit the streets to evangelize the rest
: of the world?

Like Jim Fleming does, you mean?

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
John English <je@brighton.ac.uk>, Dept. of Computing, University of Brighton
  "The Tory party is the cream of society: rich, thick, and full of clots"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------





Author: rhawkins@iastate.edu (Rick Hawkins)
Date: 1995/05/20
Raw View
In article <3pjsio$2b9@News1.mcs.com>,
Jim Fleming <jim.fleming@bytes.com> wrote:


>Let me give you the *same* answer that an ANSI C++ Committee Member gave
>me when I asked them for a list of the members of the committee.

>We can not divulge that list for fear that head-hunters would hound those
>people to death.

>Seriously, I do not think that it would be prudent for my company to tell
>people who is doing what with C+@. The best I can do is point people at
>similar efforts like JAVA from Sun...that was done by some cool C@Ts..:)


Is this comp.lang.c++, or comp.lang.kafka?

Let me get this whole thing straight: We should switch from evil C++
which sits on all of our machines, to C+@, but we're not allowed to know
what the language does, who uses it, or if runs on any machine anywhere?

People ask where to buy it, and get questioned as to what makes them an
expert?