Since previous post, I have become aware that the placement delete
is not as described in the post to which I responded, and has different
syntax, so my speculation is moot.
Sorry for the bandwidth.

   David

In article <david.22.0041611B@atl-intl.com> david@atl-intl.com writes:

>One way that occurs to me (not having read the original doc, just going on the
>post) would be to keep a table of every placement new that is active,
>checking the deleted pointer against entries in the table, but that seems
>like a kluge, so maybe there is a better way within the constraints posted.

Previous poster had written:
[deleted]
>>    delete p;
         ^^^^^^^^^^   Not this syntax, from what I have since heard.
>>calls the placement delete.

>>Please, could somebody enlighten me?
[deleted]