In article <3q4v9c$70h@rover.village.org>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> wrote:
>In article <3q3ust$l03@nils.ideon.lth.se>,
>Dag Bruck <dag@net.dynasim.se> wrote:
>> .  When things have settled down there will be one Boolean type
>>with a known name: bool.  That will make life easier.
>Why wasn't bool_t chosen?  ...
...
>wchar_t springs to mind.  Or is that reserved exclusively for things
>that are typedef'd?

This is unlikely since, with the new Standard, wchar_t is a built-in
type instead of a typedef'd type.

--
Joe Yao    jsdy@cais.com - Joseph S. D. Yao