Topic: Will RTTI be standard?
Author: craiga@atm.com (Craig Anderson)
Date: 1995/04/20 Raw View
In article <3mkkel$l7i@hermes.unt.edu>, johnw@jove.acs.unt.edu (John Robert Williams) says:
>
>I guess the subject says it all. Does anyone know how seriously RTTI is
>being considered?
_Very_ seriously. Expect it to be the standard.
Author: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
Date: 1995/04/19 Raw View
johnw@jove.acs.unt.edu (John Robert Williams) writes:
>I guess the subject says it all.
Yes, RTTI will be standard.
>Does anyone know how seriously RTTI is being considered?
It has already been accepted, and it is *extremely* unlikely that
it would be removed.
--
Fergus Henderson | As practiced by computer science, the study of
fjh@cs.mu.oz.au | programming is an unholy mixture of mathematics,
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh | literary criticism, and folklore. - B. A. Sheil
Author: mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump)
Date: 1995/04/14 Raw View
In article <3mkkel$l7i@hermes.unt.edu>,
John Robert Williams <johnw@jove.acs.unt.edu> wrote:
>I guess the subject says it all. Does anyone know how seriously RTTI is
>being considered?
It isn't being considered. Or should I say, it isn't being considered
anymore. Or should I say, it isn't being considered anymore, because
it is already in.
It's a done deal.
Author: johnw@jove.acs.unt.edu (John Robert Williams)
Date: 1995/04/14 Raw View
I guess the subject says it all. Does anyone know how seriously RTTI is
being considered?
John Williams
johnw@jove.acs.unt.edu
"Life is case sensitive."