In article <D4KywC.G1M@world.std.com>,
Thomas E Janzen <tej@world.std.com> wrote:
>Is it true that the IEEE C++ committee abandoned the dynarray and went
>with something complicated called valarray?

 Good heavens, now its an IEEE committee :-)

 Dynarray has been abandoned. Valarray still exists.
Dynarray is replaced by the STL vector container. Valarray
is for numerical programming.

--
        JOHN (MAX) SKALLER,         INTERNET:maxtal@suphys.physics.su.oz.au
 Maxtal Pty Ltd,
        81A Glebe Point Rd, GLEBE   Mem: SA IT/9/22,SC22/WG21
        NSW 2037, AUSTRALIA     Phone: 61-2-566-2189

In article <JASON.95Feb27165123@phydeaux.cygnus.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Thomas E Janzen <tej@world.std.com> writes:
>
>> Is it true that the IEEE C++ committee abandoned the dynarray
>
>Yes, in favor of STL vectors.

Just to make sure we are all clear, the C++ standard is being brought to
you by CEBMA and the International Standards Organization... not by the
IEEE.  (And I'm sure that there are more than a few EE's who are very
releaved about that. :-)

--

-- Ron Guilmette, Sunnyvale, CA ---------- RG Consulting -------------------
---- E-mail: rfg@segfault.us.com ----------- Purveyors of Compiler Test ----
-------------------------------------------- Suites and Bullet-Proof Shoes -

>>>>> Thomas E Janzen <tej@world.std.com> writes:

> Is it true that the IEEE C++ committee abandoned the dynarray

Yes, in favor of STL vectors.

> and went with something complicated called valarray?

Yes (though not as a replacement for dynarray).

Jason

Is it true that the IEEE C++ committee abandoned the dynarray and went
with something complicated called valarray?
Does anyone want to buy my copy of Plauger's "Draft Std C++ Library"?
Tom
--
Tom Janzen - tej@world.std.com USA Distributed Real-Time Data Acquisition S/W
for Scientists and Engineers using POSIX, C, C++, X, Motif, Graphics, Audio