Topic: Standard Classes in C++
Author: udvduso1@inet.uni-c.dk (Morten Wagner)
Date: 2 Nov 1994 15:24:41 GMT Raw View
I'm a bit confused (and a "newbie" too...); Are there any (de facto / de
jure) standard classes, that ought to be included with your C++ compiler?
I have a strong suspicion that "iostream"-classes and "fstream"-classes
should be - but my CSet++ compiler also includes "complex"-classes (for
complex math) and "task"-classes (for task-handling). Are these standard
in any way? Is this a FAQ?
Any hints would highly appreciated...
Regards,
Morten Wagner
udvduso1@inet.uni-c.dk
Author: jason@cygnus.com (Jason Merrill)
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 1994 21:08:57 GMT Raw View
>>>>> Morten Wagner <udvduso1@inet.uni-c.dk> writes:
> I'm a bit confused (and a "newbie" too...); Are there any (de facto / de
> jure) standard classes, that ought to be included with your C++ compiler?
> I have a strong suspicion that "iostream"-classes and "fstream"-classes
> should be - but my CSet++ compiler also includes "complex"-classes (for
> complex math) and "task"-classes (for task-handling). Are these standard
> in any way? Is this a FAQ?
They are part of the AT&T libC, and are consequently included with many C++
compilers, though not all.
The eventual standard will contain complex number classes, but not tasking
support.
Jason