Topic: What may the "bool" class look like?
Author: mharriso@elm101.dsccc.com (Mark Harrison)
Date: 14 Mar 1994 15:34:11 GMT Raw View
1. What is the proposed definition of the new bool class?
2. Is this kind of information (proposals, etc) readily availible anywhere?
Many thanks in advance...
Mark.
--
mharriso@spd.dsccc.com Mark Harrison
^^^^ NEW ADDRESS! Switching Product Division,
DSC Communications Corp.
also at: mharriso@utdallas.edu (214)519-6517
Author: grumpy@cbnewse.cb.att.com (Paul J Lucas)
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 04:37:14 GMT Raw View
Author: dag@control.lth.se (Dag Bruck)
Date: 15 Mar 1994 06:27:34 GMT Raw View
>>>>> On 14 Mar 1994 15:34:11 GMT, mharriso@elm101.dsccc.com (Mark Harrison) said:
>> 1. What is the proposed definition of the new bool class?
The new type "bool" is a built-in integral type, not a class.
I suggest you use the following definitions until your compiler gets a
real bool type:
typedef int bool;
const bool false = 0;
const bool true = 1;
You won't get any overloading, but most other things work ok.
-- Dag
Author: maxtal@physics.su.OZ.AU (John Max Skaller)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 05:00:44 GMT Raw View
In article <2m205j$k6i@sun001.dsccc.com> mharriso@elm101.dsccc.com (Mark Harrison) writes:
>1. What is the proposed definition of the new bool class?
There is no new bool class. Its a new builtin type.
>
>2. Is this kind of information (proposals, etc) readily availible anywhere?
>