Topic: RFD: comp.lang.c++.sw-design
Author: hall_j@sat.mot.com (Joseph Hall)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1993 01:50:48 GMT Raw View
This is an informal request for discussion.
I would like to solicit comments on the creation of a new newsgroup,
comp.lang.c++.sw-design, under the existing group comp.lang.c++.
The group would be organized primarily for the discussion of issues
related to the design and implementation of complex and/or subtle C++
software. E.g.:
* advanced C++ idioms (a la Coplien's book)
* C++ class library design
* C++ coding standards
* discussion of efficiency, maintainability etc. of various
idioms and implementations
* maintenance, configuration control, etc.
Additional topics might include:
* effects of newly-arrived features on C++ software design (not
to be confused with discussion of un-approved features, which should
take place in comp.std.c++)
* discussion of software tools useful to C++ software authors
* random interesting C++ obfuscations
* conversion of systems from C to C++, other OOLs to C++
Things NOT to be discussed:
* newbie how-tos
* merits of various compilers
* design of C++ compilers
* advocacy (C++ vs C/Ada/Oberon/Smalltalk)
* pecularities of C++ syntax, language issues, etc.
comp.lang.c++.sw-design might not be the best name. But
comp.lang.c++.wizards isn't really right, nor is comp.lang.c++.idioms, and
comp.lang.c++.soft-sys is confusing.
I would favor moderation. I doubt, however, that my frequent travel
would allow me to personally moderate the group (though I would like to).
I'm not sure that an unmoderated group would function properly.
Followups to news.groups.
--
Joseph Nathan Hall | Whales: smart food for smart people
Software Architect |
Gorca Systems Inc. | joseph@joebloe.maple-shade.nj.us (home)
(on assignment) | (602) 732-2549 (work) Joseph_Hall@sat.mot.com