Consider the following code:

class Foo;

void funct_1(Foo*);

void funct_2(Foo& foo_p) {
 funct_1(&foo_p);
}

Here we apply the & operator to a reference to an incomplete class, hoping
to obtain the corresponding pointer to the same incomplete class.
Consider, though, that class Foo might overload operator &, meaning that
application of the default meaning of operator & would be incorrect.
Nevertheless, should the compiler accept it?  Reference to explicit text
in the ARM would be nice; if it isn't mentioned, I'd appreciate seeing
opinions from the gurus.


--
Joe Buck jbuck@ohm.berkeley.edu