Topic: Assignment operators return lvalues -- why?
Author: jsa@edg1.UUCP (J. Stephen Adamczyk)
Date: 22 Apr 91 22:06:43 GMT Raw View
The ARM (5.1.7) says that the value of an assignment operator is
an lvalue. That's different than ANSI C (3.3.16). There must
be a reason for the difference; can anyone enlighten me?
Also (different topic) -- is the example right at the end of
12.4 of the ARM, i.e.,
int *p;
p->int::~int();
really thought to be legal? Isn't the name to the left of "::"
required to be a class-name?
Steve Adamczyk (jsa@edg.com or uunet!edg1!jsa; 201-744-2620)