Consider the following program:

 class One {
  friend class Two;
 private:
  One();
 };

 class Two {
  static One test;
 }

 One Two::test;

The last line draws an error from both cfront and Turbo C++:
 error:  ..() cannot access One::One(): private  member

Why the complaint? My interpretation of the scoping rules says that
the Two:: qualifier puts me into Two's scope. Since Two is a friend
of One, I don't see why it can't access One's private constructor.
Incidentally, the error remains even if I rewrite the last line as
 One Two::test = One();
and the ARM says explicitly that the initializing expression is
interpreted in the context of Two.

What am I misunderstanding here? Can somebody quote the language rule
that I'm missing? Or are both compilers violating the language standard?
Oh, and how do I write this legally? The intent is to make it impossible
to create objects of type One, except inside Two (which then hands out
references to One objects).

Thanks
  -- perry
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perry The Cynic (Peter Kiehtreiber)         perry@arkon.key.com
** What good signature isn't taken yet? **  {amdahl,sgi,pacbell}!key!perry