------=_Part_206_12468722.1358785162247
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,
I already asked this in comments to
http://isocpp.org/blog/2012/12/an-implementation-of-generic-lambdas-request-for-feedback-faisal-vali
but apparently nobody reads those comments :(
So is there a chance future standard might allow for simple use of lambda
as comparator parameter in for example std::map
for those who dont know what Im talking about:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8736997/using-lambdas-in-maps

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



------=_Part_206_12468722.1358785162247
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, <br>I already asked this in comments to <br>http://isocpp.org/blog/2012=
/12/an-implementation-of-generic-lambdas-request-for-feedback-faisal-vali<b=
r>but apparently nobody reads those comments :(<br>So is there a chance fut=
ure standard might allow for simple use of lambda as comparator parameter i=
n for example std::map<br>for those who dont know what Im talking about:<br=
>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8736997/using-lambdas-in-maps<br><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_206_12468722.1358785162247--

.

------=_Part_1485_16900510.1358794127969
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

this was pretty much the driving idea behind my suggestion:

https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/1NFQeAP1wJA/di=
scussion

(But I don't think this would be the only benefit.)

Regards,
Robert

2013. janu=E1r 21., h=E9tf=F5 17:19:22 UTC+1 id=F5pontban nx02co...@gmail.c=
om a=20
k=F6vetkez=F5t =EDrta:
>
> Hi,=20
> I already asked this in comments to=20
>
> http://isocpp.org/blog/2012/12/an-implementation-of-generic-lambdas-reque=
st-for-feedback-faisal-vali
> but apparently nobody reads those comments :(
> So is there a chance future standard might allow for simple use of lambda=
=20
> as comparator parameter in for example std::map
> for those who dont know what Im talking about:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8736997/using-lambdas-in-maps
>
>

--=20

---=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa=
ls/?hl=3Den.



------=_Part_1485_16900510.1358794127969
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,<br><br>this was pretty much the driving idea behind my suggestion:<b=
r><br>https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/1NFQeAP1=
wJA/discussion<br><br>(But I don't think this would be the only benefit.)<b=
r><br>Regards,<br>Robert<br><br>2013. janu=E1r 21., h=E9tf=F5 17:19:22 UTC+=
1 id=F5pontban nx02co...@gmail.com a k=F6vetkez=F5t =EDrta:<blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Hi, <br>I already asked this in comments to <b=
r><a href=3D"http://isocpp.org/blog/2012/12/an-implementation-of-generic-la=
mbdas-request-for-feedback-faisal-vali" target=3D"_blank">http://isocpp.org=
/blog/2012/<wbr>12/an-implementation-of-<wbr>generic-lambdas-request-for-<w=
br>feedback-faisal-vali</a><br>but apparently nobody reads those comments :=
(<br>So is there a chance future standard might allow for simple use of lam=
bda as comparator parameter in for example std::map<br>for those who dont k=
now what Im talking about:<br><a href=3D"http://stackoverflow.com/questions=
/8736997/using-lambdas-in-maps" target=3D"_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/=
<wbr>questions/8736997/using-<wbr>lambdas-in-maps</a><br><br></blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_1485_16900510.1358794127969--

.