------=_Part_2574_3753839.1358883219935
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Just in case you missed
it: http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-standards-papers-mailing-available

What's the proper place to discuss proposals?
Proposals contain a reply-to header, but having discussion in public seems
better.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



------=_Part_2574_3753839.1358883219935
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Just in case you missed it: http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-sta=
ndards-papers-mailing-available<div><br></div><div>What's the proper place =
to discuss proposals?</div><div>Proposals contain a reply-to header, but ha=
ving discussion in public seems better.</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_2574_3753839.1358883219935--

.

------=_Part_1860_16928269.1358884008467
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:33:39 PM UTC-6, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
> Just in case you missed it:
> http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-standards-papers-mailing-available
>
> What's the proper place to discuss proposals?
> Proposals contain a reply-to header, but having discussion in public seems
> better.
>

Oh man, I'm embarrassed that I didn't finish up the RAII wrapper /
scoped_exit (http://www.andrewlsandoval.com/scoped_exit/) proposal in time,
but I've just been swamped.  Hopefully soon!  I got stuck on the
"standardese."

-Andrew Sandoval

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



------=_Part_1860_16928269.1358884008467
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:33:39 PM UTC-6, Olaf van der Spek wrote:<blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-=
left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Just in case you missed it:&nbsp;<=
a href=3D"http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-standards-papers-mailing-a=
vailable" target=3D"_blank">http://isocpp.org/blog/<wbr>2013/01/january-sta=
ndards-<wbr>papers-mailing-available</a><div><br></div><div>What's the prop=
er place to discuss proposals?</div><div>Proposals contain a reply-to heade=
r, but having discussion in public seems better.</div></blockquote><div><br=
>Oh man, I'm embarrassed that I didn't finish up the RAII wrapper / scoped_=
exit (http://www.andrewlsandoval.com/scoped_exit/) proposal in time, but I'=
ve just been swamped.&nbsp; Hopefully soon!&nbsp; I got stuck on the "stand=
ardese."<br><br>-Andrew Sandoval<br></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_1860_16928269.1358884008467--

.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Olaf van der Spek
<olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just in case you missed it:
> http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-standards-papers-mailing-available
>
> What's the proper place to discuss proposals?
> Proposals contain a reply-to header, but having discussion in public seems
> better.

Thanks for announcing it. Someone official probably should have. :)

This list is great for discussing proposals, assuming Herb or someone
else official doesn't contradict me. Some discussion will also happen
on a few committee-member-only lists, but of course those have the
downside of not being accessible to as many people.

Jeffrey

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



.

> > Just in case you missed it:
> >
http://isocpp.org/blog/2013/01/january-standards-papers-mailing-available
> >
> > What's the proper place to discuss proposals?
> > Proposals contain a reply-to header, but having discussion in public
> > seems better.
>
> Thanks for announcing it. Someone official probably should have. :)
>
> This list is great for discussing proposals, assuming Herb or someone else
> official doesn't contradict me. Some discussion will also happen on a few
> committee-member-only lists, but of course those have the downside of not
> being accessible to as many people.

Right, discussion happens naturally on the internal lists, but this is the
right place -- this forum/list was created as a place for both committee
members and non-members to discuss new and existing proposals.

Herb


--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



.

------=_Part_723_15756242.1358908424276
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Does this listing mean that those are the only proposals to be considered
for Bristol? If not, what is the cut-off? I realized that I had implicitly
assumed that I had months left to work on my proposals (and decide if
losing my anonymity was worth it), but of course, that might well not be
the case.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



------=_Part_723_15756242.1358908424276
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does this listing mean that those are the only proposals to be considered f=
or Bristol? If not, what is the cut-off? I realized that I had implicitly a=
ssumed that I had months left to work on my proposals (and decide if losing=
 my anonymity was worth it), but of course, that might well not be the case=
..

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@iso=
cpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_723_15756242.1358908424276--

.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 06:33:44PM -0800, DeadMG wrote:
> Does this listing mean that those are the only proposals to be considered
> for Bristol? If not, what is the cut-off?

This was just a mid-term mailing - see
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/: "The deadline for the next
mailing is 2013-03-15" (which will be the pre-Bristol mailing)


Christof

--

http://cmeerw.org                              sip:cmeerw at cmeerw.org
mailto:cmeerw at cmeerw.org                   xmpp:cmeerw at cmeerw.org

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



.

On 23 January 2013 04:33, DeadMG <wolfeinstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this listing mean that those are the only proposals to be considered
> for Bristol? If not, what is the cut-off? I realized that I had implicitly
> assumed that I had months left to work on my proposals (and decide if losing
> my anonymity was worth it), but of course, that might well not be the case.

I suppose there are ways to maintain that anonymity:

1) just don't put your name into your paper
2) let someone else publish your paper. You will need a
meeting-attending-champion
anyway, so that champion can proxy-publish your paper and get all the glory
associated.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



.