------=_Part_64_29880685.1366722445592
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

All,

Can anyone shed light on why section 4 of N3655 wasn't accepted into the
committee draft?
It seems equivalently beneficial and cheap as the rest of the paper, and
although the benefits to each are small in the grand scheme of things it
seems odd to reject this one section.

Rob

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



------=_Part_64_29880685.1366722445592
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,<div><br></div><div>Can anyone shed light on why section 4 of N3655 was=
n't accepted into the committee draft?</div><div>It seems equivalently bene=
ficial and cheap as the rest of the paper, and although the benefits to eac=
h are small in the grand scheme of things it seems odd to reject this one s=
ection.</div><div><br></div><div>Rob</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_64_29880685.1366722445592--

.

2013/4/23  <rob.desbois@gmail.com>:
> All,
>
> Can anyone shed light on why section 4 of N3655 wasn't accepted into the
> committee draft?
> It seems equivalently beneficial and cheap as the rest of the paper, and
> although the benefits to each are small in the grand scheme of things it
> seems odd to reject this one section.

The project editor had severe concerns in regard to this extended
addition requiring about 4 additional pages in the standard with
questionable value, therefore it was withdrawn at this point of time.
This doesn't mean that it could not be added in the future.

- Daniel

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



.

------=_Part_2469_16990236.1366724921354
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:10:25 UTC+1, Daniel Kr=FCgler wrote:

> 2013/4/23  <rob.d...@gmail.com <javascript:>>:=20
> > All,=20
> >=20
> > Can anyone shed light on why section 4 of N3655 wasn't accepted into th=
e=20
> > committee draft?=20
>
> The project editor had severe concerns in regard to this extended=20
> addition requiring about 4 additional pages in the standard with=20
> questionable value, therefore it was withdrawn at this point of time.=20


Thanks Daniel, seems like a reasonable concern.
Copy-paste it is then :-)

Rob

--=20

---=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa=
ls/?hl=3Den.



------=_Part_2469_16990236.1366724921354
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:10:25 UTC+1, Daniel Kr=FCgler  wrote:<br><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-l=
eft: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">2013/4/23 &nbsp;&lt;<a href=3D"java=
script:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"RojAZ-EWDXYJ">rob.d...@=
gmail.com</a>&gt;:
<br>&gt; All,
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; Can anyone shed light on why section 4 of N3655 wasn't accepted in=
to the
<br>&gt; committee draft?
<br>
<br>The project editor had severe concerns in regard to this extended
<br>addition requiring about 4 additional pages in the standard with
<br>questionable value, therefore it was withdrawn at this point of time.&n=
bsp;</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks Daniel, seems like a reasonable=
 concern.</div><div>Copy-paste it is then :-)</div><div><br></div><div>Rob<=
/div><div><br></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_2469_16990236.1366724921354--

.