Topic: std::optional no longer on target for C++14?
Author: Troy Heron <troy.heron@hixxy.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Raw View
------=_Part_1887_1129111.1380682750921
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I've just noticed on reddit that it seems std::optional is no longer on
target for being apart of C++14, but postponed until a future TR. Just
curious about why this has happened? Are there any public comments on this
yet?
Troy
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.
------=_Part_1887_1129111.1380682750921
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I've just noticed on reddit that it seems std::optional is=
no longer on target for being apart of C++14, but postponed until a future=
TR. Just curious about why this has happened? Are there any public comment=
s on this yet?<div><br></div><div>Troy</div></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />
------=_Part_1887_1129111.1380682750921--
.
Author: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:56:13 +0300
Raw View
--001a11c22634efd00104e7ba0cd7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 2 October 2013 05:59, Troy Heron <troy.heron@hixxy.org> wrote:
> I've just noticed on reddit that it seems std::optional is no longer on
> target for being apart of C++14, but postponed until a future TR. Just
> curious about why this has happened? Are there any public comments on this
> yet?
>
>
>
There are certain enhancements that were desired, and the committee didn't
think it was a good
idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so optional was taken out
of C++14 and
put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification. The
TS may come out
as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-merge the things in
it into C++17.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.
--001a11c22634efd00104e7ba0cd7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On 2 October 2013 05:59, Troy Heron <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:troy.heron@hixxy.org" target=3D"_blank">troy.heron@hixxy.org</a>=
></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I've just noticed on re=
ddit that it seems std::optional is no longer on target for being apart of =
C++14, but postponed until a future TR. Just curious about why this has hap=
pened? Are there any public comments on this yet?<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><fo=
nt color=3D"#888888"><div>
<br><br></div></font></span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There ar=
e certain enhancements that were desired, and the committee didn't thin=
k it was a good<br>idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so opt=
ional was taken out of C++14 and<br>
put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification. The =
TS may come out<br>as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-m=
erge the things in it into C++17. <br></div></div><br></div></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />
--001a11c22634efd00104e7ba0cd7--
.
Author: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Raw View
------=_Part_239_21975984.1381181100253
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:56:13 AM UTC+2, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 2 October 2013 05:59, Troy Heron <troy....@hixxy.org <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed on reddit that it seems std::optional is no longer on
>> target for being apart of C++14, but postponed until a future TR. Just
>> curious about why this has happened? Are there any public comments on this
>> yet?
>>
>>
>>
> There are certain enhancements that were desired, and the committee didn't
> think it was a good
> idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so optional was taken
> out of C++14 and
> put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification. The
> TS may come out
> as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-merge the things in
> it into C++17.
>
> When was this decided (just curious)? It's the first time I read about it.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.
------=_Part_239_21975984.1381181100253
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br>On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:56:13 AM UTC+2, Vi=
lle Voutilainen wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;=
margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=
=3D"ltr"><br><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 2 October 2013 05:5=
9, Troy Heron <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blan=
k" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"45CK9pkS6GoJ">troy....@hixxy.org</a>></span>=
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I've just noticed on reddit=
that it seems std::optional is no longer on target for being apart of C++1=
4, but postponed until a future TR. Just curious about why this has happene=
d? Are there any public comments on this yet?<span><font color=3D"#888888">=
<div>
<br><br></div></font></span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There ar=
e certain enhancements that were desired, and the committee didn't think it=
was a good<br>idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so optiona=
l was taken out of C++14 and<br>
put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification. The =
TS may come out<br>as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-m=
erge the things in it into C++17. <br></div></div><br></div></div></blockqu=
ote><div>When was this decided (just curious)? It's the first time I read a=
bout it. </div></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />
------=_Part_239_21975984.1381181100253--
.
Author: Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:40:58 -0500
Raw View
--047d7bd77058538e2204e82d84b2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 7 October 2013 16:25, Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There are certain enhancements that were desired, and the committee didn't
>> think it was a good
>> idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so optional was taken
>> out of C++14 and
>> put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification.
>> The TS may come out
>> as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-merge the things
>> in it into C++17.
>>
>> When was this decided (just curious)? It's the first time I read about
> it.
>
Less than two weeks ago. I assume something will be written up in the
post-Chicago mailing. The requested enhancements for optional are
templated comparison operators and mixed-type assignments.
--
Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.
--047d7bd77058538e2204e82d84b2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On 7 October 2013 16:25, Olaf van der Spek <span dir=3D"lt=
r"><<a href=3D"mailto:olafvdspek@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">olafvdspek=
@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"im"><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>There are certain enh=
ancements that were desired, and the committee didn't think it was a go=
od<br>idea to shoehorn those enhancements in in a rush, so optional was tak=
en out of C++14 and<br>
put into the forthcoming Library Fundamentals Technical Specification. The =
TS may come out<br>as early as 2014, or early 2015, and the plan is to re-m=
erge the things in it into C++17. <br></div></div><br></div></div></blockqu=
ote>
</div><div>When was this decided (just curious)? It's the first time I =
read about it. <br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"g=
mail_extra">Less than two weeks ago.=A0 I assume something will be written =
up in the post-Chicago mailing.=A0 The requested enhancements for optional =
are templated comparison operators and mixed-type assignments.<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">-- <br>=A0Nevin ":-)" Liber=A0 &=
lt;mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com" target=3D"_blank">nevin=
@eviloverlord.com</a>>=A0 (847) 691-1404
</div></div>
<p></p>
-- <br />
<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />
--047d7bd77058538e2204e82d84b2--
.