------=_Part_1042_7826692.1382735009536
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I just found out that C just added anonymous unions in C-2011. They also
added anonymous structs, which we don't have. Can we have them? Would it be
OK for someone to propose them, or is there some fundamental
breakage/hatred towards them like we had for C-1999's variable-length
arrays?

Daryle W.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

------=_Part_1042_7826692.1382735009536
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I just found out that C just added anonymous unions in C-2=
011. They also added anonymous structs, which we don't have. Can we have th=
em? Would it be OK for someone to propose them, or is there some fundamenta=
l breakage/hatred towards them like we had for C-1999's variable-length arr=
ays?<div><br></div><div>Daryle W.</div><div><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />

------=_Part_1042_7826692.1382735009536--

.