Topic: Any reason to not base multiprecision integer
Author: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:04:23 +0100
Raw View
2014-12-15 22:22 GMT+01:00 Vincent Reverdy <vince.rev@gmail.com>:
> Hello.
>
> I would like to know why the current multiprecision integer (N4038) is not
> based on the existing practices of boost::cpp_int that seem to be far more
> versatile (it can represents both fixed and arbitrary precision integers for
> example). Is there any reason for that?
I cannot answer your question. I suggest to contact the author of the
paper and to give any feedback back to this group.
Thanks,
- Daniel
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.
.