Topic: [c++std-core-27235] [std-discussion] Re:


Author: Andrew Sutton <asutton.list@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:29 -0500
Raw View
> I would argue for a third audience (though arguably a subset of the 2nd case
> above):
>
> 3.  The person modifying the function.  They have to know whether or not it
> is a template or a specific concrete type.
>
> We can say that, if a person changes a function without first determining
> that and causes a regression, well shame on them.  I think that is fair.
> But I think we can do better by offering a little assistance.

But do we have to mandate that assistance in every case?

Andrew

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

.