On 12 August 2016 at 18:09, Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> wrote:
> The orginal proposal was for naming the traits and_ and or_, but those were
> rejected as being too close to other names.
>
> The uglier names std::conjunction and std::disjunction were chosen
> specifically to not interfere with others. I don't think a proposal to
> rename them back will be accepted.  :-)
>
> http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2015/p0013r1.html


I can easily imagine such a proposal not even being considered, but
there are other mechanisms
to send messages to the committee besides proposals, and those
mechanisms mandate consideration
and an answer. However, that's beside the point, because the names of
the logical traits are indeed
not really the topic here.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAFk2RUbyrsw9dFXH1LyM-C0sPUcbrQPEXpg7chy56k6U8juQUQ%40mail.gmail.com.

.