On 22 December 2016 at 19:25, Nicol Bolas <jmckesson@gmail.com> wrote:
> No. We should not add C++ syntax explicitly and solely for dealing with
> compiler/debugger issues.


...and I would expect it to be quite doable to add fairly sane
pretty-printers with reflection, once we get there.
Furthermore, such syntax doesn't go very far since it's
implementation-specific to quite an extent what it will
print. And how any pretty-printers tie into different debuggers is a
completely separate problem to solve.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/msgid/std-proposals/CAFk2RUZQbkcacb3UW02o9qXOWd5SrkfGBS3RwoonswN3u0fezg%40mail.gmail.com.

.